Month: June 2021

Post #4 – Interaction

The topic we discussed is the learning of the R language. This video can be used by students in grade 12 and above. Because the video covers some concepts about R language, interesting editing, and monologue forms, students can clearly understand the wide range of uses and convenience of R language. This is a video that explains why R is a better choice than other statistical software packages and software options (including SPSS, STATA, SAS, etc.). Making students understand that learning theme-R language is worth learning.  

1. What kind of interaction would the video require from your students? Does it force them to respond in some way (inherent)? 

This video contains designed interactions. In fact, some media or technologies are not inherently interactive, but they can be explicitly designed to encourage interaction with learners (Bates, 2019). In our R language teaching, we do not force students to respond. Teachers can add activities in specific media to allow students to discuss based on the content of the podcast every few minutes. Therefore, designed interactions are suitable for teaching programming. 

2. In what way are they likely to respond to the video on their own, e.g. make notes, do an activity, think about the topic (learner-generated)?

Students will respond to the video by remembering how to participate in the activity. We have designed the students’ self-programming attempts and group discussions in the teaching plan, so students will be more willing to try simple programming in the R language after watching the video. 

3. How much work for you would that activity cause? Would the work be both manageable and worthwhile? Could the activity be scaled for larger numbers of students? 

I use a short presentation to let students have a better experience and follow the cases I wrote. For example, I calculated the average and median of two variables, plotted a simple 2*2 matrix, and calculated the correlation coefficient. Students only need to retype the code that I wrote at a slow pace to achieve a simple learning process of understanding and memorizing. So, there is not much workload in class. Moreover, this example operation is suitable for large-scale teaching but not suitable for management. 

4. How could the video have been designed to generate more or better activity from viewers or students? 

This video uses interesting explanations and simple real codes to improve students’ enthusiasm for learning R. Students may like to request more open discussions in the class activities. Students can understand mathematical logic and simple programming concepts through simple thinking. This kind of video is conducive to the participation and thinking of students. 

Reference

Bates, A. W. (2019, October 10). 9.6 Interaction. Teaching in a Digital Age Second Edition. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev2/chapter/pedagogical-roles-for-text-audio-and-video/. 

R Programming 101. (2018, December 14). R programming for beginners – Why you should use R.[Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/cnkKHL_dyGE

Post #3 – Inclusive design

Today, I want to discuss the learning obstacles that may be encountered in the learning design of our group and how to reduce these obstacles and help learners succeed. First, let’s watch a wonderful speech video and then think about how to manage the current situation to reduce those learning barriers.

We have designed group discussions of R language learning in the classroom, self-trying, and teacher-answering methods to better interact with students. Our goal is to ensure that all students above grade 12 can successfully accept the learning and basic use of the R language. For the R language, persuading students and encouraging their learning spirit is the basis for supporting all learning. 

We have designed group discussions of R language learning in the classroom, self-trying, and teacher-answering methods to better interact with students. Our goal is to ensure that all students above grade 12 can successfully accept the learning and basic use of the R language. For the R language, persuading students and encouraging their learning spirit is the basis for supporting all learning.  
In Meyer’s article (2021), the classic “selective attention test” shows the attention variability in our population. Therefore, we will provide learners with a summary of R language learning notes and programming manuals to allow learners to learn in any environment, different topic materials, difficult/easy tasks, and assessments. To avoid a large number of learning obstacles for students, students’ levels of understanding must be perfectly matched. Besides, We will firmly follow Inclusive Education Canadian laws and UNESCO laws to ensure every student has equal rights to study and engage with the R language.

According to UNESCO (2009), which takes a broad view of the concept of inclusion, has identified four key tenets of an inclusive education system: 

  1. Inclusion is a process. 
  1. Inclusion is concerned with the identification and removal of barriers. 
  1. Inclusion is about the presence, participation, and achievement of all students. 
  1. Inclusion involves an emphasis on those groups of learners who may be at risk of marginalization, exclusion, or underachievement. 

Reference

Meyer, Anne, et al. (2021). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice. CAST Professional Publishing, an Imprint of CAST, Inc., 2014, UDL Theory Practice, retrieved from: udltheorypractice.cast.org/

Right to Education – Inclusive Education, retrieved from: https://www.inclusiveeducation.ca/learn/right-to-education/

TEDx Talks. (2017, May 18). Removing barriers to inclusion & participation – user-centred design | Gary Evans | TEDxStPeterPort[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVu_dUHu5CU

UNESCO. (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. Retrieved June 17, 2021 from https://unesdoc​.unesco​.org/images/0017/001778/177849e.pdf

Peer review

Hi, Sandra Wang, Xinyi Ye, and Huatian He

Thanks for sharing your ILR draft (pod 6 “Leadership skills – communication” — https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uYmu4oPqkbREK_uqST0SB828ckOSkZBWL3tYK1KhcKY/edit). l reviewed the entire course from the perspective of a business student, and I thought that your works were done clearly. Personally, I am interested in your topic.

Overall, I think that the study design plan in your group conforms to the teaching arrangements. The use of cooperative learning methods can ensure that students/business learners participate in and learn the knowledge brought by teamwork, which is helpful to develop their commercial thinking based on leadership skills. I appreciate your group’s “Topic and activity” because this part is in line with the current concept of open-teaching in business. In addition, I list some good points below:

  1. The overall curriculum framework and rationale are clear
  2. The selection of target groups is reasonable
  3. The fundamental problem setting is attractive with business-inspiring logic

But in terms of details, your group needs to improve the activities and scoring details in the assessment plan. First, I think you should list specific examples, such as 10 authentic leadership communication styles and at least three differences between formal and informal communication in the business context. Second, I think the formative assessment should have scoring details, and you should choose interesting and opening cases in case selection. For specific details, please refer to the Com250 syllabus by Professor Lawrance at the UVIC Business School. In the summative assessment part, I suggest substituting a group business innovation research report for exams. For specific details, please refer to the Com220 syllabus by Professor Sang H. Nam at the UVIC Business School.

Finally, I hope you can refer to my suggestions and make some changes. I sincerely wish to see your revised version. Good luck!

© 2024 Sam Song’s blog

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑